People process tools triangle

If you were the restaurant manager, you would need to dig deeper to determine which area is causing the problem and establish a plan to fix it. Here a few steps to follow:. After you have identified the weaknesses in each area, create a path forward by answering these questions:. After you have generated your answers, create clear milestones, schedule training if necessary, create committees, and make the necessary purchases to help you achieve those goals in the stated time frames.

As you create your organizational development plan, make sure you create checkpoints between milestones to assess your progress so you can make adjustments as needed. For example, you might find that a particular employee has a more robust skill set than you originally thought, making them a candidate for a future leadership role and putting them on a new training track.

You might also discover new tools or processes that you were previously unaware of, making it possible to create a new milestone. Take a good look at your team. If you could improve in just one area, would it be the people, the process, or the tools? We recommend letting employees update their goals in real-time, allow them to comment on achievements and development needs, and allow them to rate their own competencies and skills and provide examples to support their self-ratings.

Employees often work with multiple managers or teams to accomplish their goals. Reviews that incorporate manager-only input risk leaving out a giant piece of the performance-picture. When you think of the people who should be involved in the process, think beyond managers and second-level supervisors, to company-wide, multi-rater peer input.

The idea is to create a culture where employees know that their daily behaviors and actions are being recognized by managers and factored into their evaluation.

As an added bonus, input from others helps managers provide more accurate reviews and much better comments as they often uncover observations they would have missed! Most often, getting the right people involved is only the first hurdle — you also have to make sure they are equipped with the tools to ensure they are effective participants.

We recommend communicating with your workforce on the purpose behind feedback and sharing tips and expectations for what the feedback should focus on and when it should be given. There is no question that traditional once-a-year appraisals are nowhere near enough to give employees the input they need to develop, or to ensure organizational performance goals stay on track from day-to-day. Many organizations are redesigning their process to incorporate more check-ins and touch-points for managers and employees so that their process is more of an ongoing conversation about goals progress and employee feedback.

This sounds great and makes sense in theory but the reality is that every organization should design their own processes that factor in their unique circumstances and needs.

We suggest that clients plan a transition strategy from where they are now to where they would like to be and ensure its workforce knows the trajectory and what will be expected of them. For companies looking to evolve from annual appraisals to a more continuous performance management process, we suggest phasing it in gradually. Start with a mid-year check-in along with informal feedback and performance journals, then move to quarterly and then monthly reviews.

For companies who operate around long-term projects, annual appraisals might not even make sense, instead, a company might choose ad-hoc project evaluations with day check-ins for new hires. For new companies or those growing quickly with feedback-hungry millennial and Gen-Z employees, a swift tear down and build-up of a completely new and ongoing performance management process might be the best strategy and welcomed by all with open arms. Hiring managers should work with HR to develop questions while keeping their personality as a manager intact.

Remember, especially in a job seeker's market, candidates will assess both the organization as well as the people they interact with. A process is a collection of steps or activities that work together to achieve a specific goal. The procedure in the P-P-T concept primarily specifies the "how. How are we going to get the desired result? How do we use individuals and technology to fix a company problem? Processes are repeatable actions that, in theory, deliver the same outcome regardless of who performs them.

Being a process and workflow automation company, we obviously have put a lot of thought and resources together to help companies get processes right. A common mistake organizations make is investing in various tools and then subsequently trying to fit people and processes into them. Tools are ineffective unless they are supported by the right people who follow the proper procedures.

As a result, tools and technology should always be the last consideration after the issue has been thoroughly understood, the talent has been trained, and the process specifications have been established. To ensure that your organization chooses the correct tools to implement, a complete audit of your current tools should be conducted to define what is working and where improvement is needed. Using the P-P-t concept, you can detect bottlenecks, remove waste, improve productivity, and decrease time to value.

How People React to New Software. What Are Companies Automating? To see how quickly you can begin automating your processes and saving people time, request a demonstration or trial of Integrify.

Get a Free Demo. View Resources Get a Demo.